Assessment of morphological and anatomical variability in Triticum species, Aegilops species, interspecific and intergeneric hybrids

Keywords: genotypic variability; morphology; stomatal patterns; wheat species; wheat wild relatives

Abstract

Wheat species and wild relatives offer promising resources for wheat improvement and research in the current period of the genetic narrowing of modern wheat cultivars. The present study was performed to evaluate the morphological and anatomical traits of 20 diverse genotypes including Triticum and Aegilops species with intergeneric and interspecific wheat hybrids, which were compared with modern bread and durum wheat cultivars locally adapted to rainfed and irrigated conditions. The study showed that stomata density and size ranged from 55.3 to 108.6 stomata/mm2 and 401.4 to 1296 µm2, respectively, in the selected genotypes. Moving tetraploid to hexaploid genotypes, increased chromosome numbers yielded lower densities of large stomata in wheat species and hybrids. In this regard, the stomatal patterns of two hexaploid wheat hybrids and a wheat species including ‘Agrotriticum’, ‘Aegilotriticum’, and T. compactum, were of low density and large size stomata compared to T. durum cv. ‘Kunduru 1149’ with high density and small size stomata. Interestingly, the wild progenitor of the bread wheat D genome, Ae. tauschii, had a high density of the smallest stomata among the studied genotypes. The study further indicated that morphological parameters decreased under rainfed conditions compared to those under irrigated conditions, with levels varying among the genotypes. The rainfed flag leaf area and 1000-grain weight varied from 0.9 to 23.7 cm2 and from 7.3 to 61.9 g, respectively under rainfed conditions, while they ranged from 1.2 to 35.7 cm2 and 11.5 to 69.9 g under irrigated conditions. The flag leaf area had a significant and strong association with 1000-grain weight under rainfed (r2= 0.79) and irrigated (r2 = 0.77) conditions. T. turanicum and T. polonicum were characterized by the significantly highest 1000-grain weight in both rainfed and irrigated conditions. This study suggests that these wheat species with high 1000-grain weight might have promising alleles to be transferred into durum wheat to increase grain yield.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Arzani A, Ashraf M (2017). Cultivated ancient wheats (Triticum spp.): A potential source of health‐beneficial food products. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 16:477-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12262

Bibi A, Sadaqat HA, Tahir MHN, Akram HM (2012). Screening of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor var monech) for drought tolerance at seedling stage in polyethyelene glycol. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 22:671- 678.

Biswal AK, Kohli A (2013). Cereal flag leaf adaptations for grain yield under drought: Knowledge status and gaps. Molecular Breeding 31:749-766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-013-9847-7

Buckley TN (2005). The control of stomata by water balance. New Phytologist 168:275-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01543.x

Caine RS, Yin X, Sloan J, Harrison EL, Mohammed U, Fulton T, Coe RA (2019). Rice with reduced stomatal density conserves water and has improved drought tolerance under future climate conditions. New Phytologist 221:371-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15344

Cakmak I, Pfeiffer WH, McClafferty B (2010). Biofortification of durum wheat with zinc and iron. Cereal Chemistry 87:10-20. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-87-1-0010

Chandra K, Das AK (2000). Correlation and intercorrelation of physiological parameters in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under rainfed transplanted condition. Crop Research 19:251-254.

Cortan D, Vilotic D, Sijacic-Nikolic M, Miljkovic D (2017). Leaf stomatal traits variation within and among black poplar native populations in Serbia. Bosque 38:337-345. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002017000200011

Doheny-Adams T, Hunt L, Franks PJ, Beerling DJ, Gray JE (2012). Genetic manipulation of stomatal density influences stomatal size, plant growth and tolerance to restricted water supply across a growth carbon dioxide gradient. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367:547-555. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0272

Drake PL, Froend RH, Franks PJ (2013). Smaller, faster stomata: Scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany 64:495-505. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers347

Dunn J, Hunt L, Afsharinafar M, Meselmani MA, Mitchell A, Howells R, Gray JE (2019). Reduced stomatal density in bread wheat leads to increased water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 70:4737-4748. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz248

Feldman M, Lupton F, Miller T (1995) Wheats. In: Smartt J, Simmonds NW (Eds). Evolution of Crop Plants. 2nd edn. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific & Technical, pp 184-192.

Giraldo P, Benavente E, Manzano-Agugliaro F, Gimenez E (2019). Worldwide research trends on wheat and barley: A bibliometric comparative analysis. Agronomy 9:1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070352

Grausgruber H, Oberforster M, Ghambashidze G, Ruckenbauer P (2005). Yield and agronomic traits of Khorasan wheat (Triticum turanicum Jakubz.). Field Crops Research 91:319-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.08.001

Hetherington AM, Woodward FI (2003). The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424:901-908.

Hofmann W, Dobrenz A (1983). Stomate density in sorghum hybrids and parental lines. Forage and Grain: Agriculture report 49-50. Accessed at: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/200440

Huang X, Börner A, Röder M, Ganal M (2002). Assessing genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm using microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105:699-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-0959-4

Huang X, Wang C, Hou J, Du C, Liu S, Kang J, ... Ma D (2020). Coordination of carbon and nitrogen accumulation and translocation of winter wheat plant to improve grain yield and processing quality. Scientific Reports 10(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67343-5

Ikanović J, Popović V, Janković S, Živanović L, Rakić S, Dončić D (2014). Khorasan wheat population researching (Triticum turgidum ssp. turanicum (Mckey) in the minimum tillage conditions. Genetika 46:105-115. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1401105I

Kardiman R, Ræbild A (2018). Relationship between stomatal density, size and speed of opening in sumatran rainforest species. Tree Physiology 38:696-705. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx149

Kishii M (2019). An update of recent use of Aegilops species in wheat breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00585

Kosina R (1995). Tetraploids of the genus Triticum in the light of caryopsis structure. Prace Botaniczne, 66, Uniwersytet Wrocławski-Wydawnictwo, Wrocław, Poland

Kuckuck H (1959). Neuere arbeiten zur Entstehung der hexaploiden Kulturweizen. Z. Pflanzenzuchtung 41:205-226.

Lannucci A, Codianni P (2019). Phenotypic parent selection within a Khorasan wheat collection and genetic variation in advanced breeding lines derived by hybridization with durum wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01460

Li D, Long D, Li T, Wu Y, Wang Y, Zeng J, Zhang H (2018). Cytogenetics and stripe rust resistance of wheat-Thinopyrum elongatum hybrid derivatives. Molecular Cytogenetics 11:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-018-0366-4

Limochi K, Eskandari H (2013). Effect of planting date on the performance of flag leaf stomata and grain yield of rice cultivars. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 4:769-773.

Longnecker N, Kirby E, Robson A (1993). Leaf emergence, tiller growth, and apical development of nitrogen‐deficient spring wheat. Crop Science 33:154-160. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300010028x

Mathre D, Johnston R, Martin J (1985). Sources of resistance to Cephalosporium gramineum in Triticum and Agropyron species. Euphytica 34:419-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022937

Mohammady S, Khazaei H, Reisi F (2007). The study of stomatal characteristics in iranian wheat wild accessions and land races. Wheat Information Service 103:5-12.

Németh M, Janda T, Horváth E, Páldi E, Szalai G (2002). Exogenous salicylic acid increases polyamine content but may decrease drought tolerance in maize. Plant Science 162: 569-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00593-3

Ohsumi A, Kanemura T, Homma K, Horie T, Shiraiwa T (2007). Genotypic variation of stomatal conductance in relation to stomatal density and length in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Production Science 10:322-328. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.10.322

Öztürk İ, Şen A, Kılıç, TH, Şili Ş (2020). Selection of advanced mutant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines based on yield and quality parameters. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 7:87-95. https://doi.org/10.30910/Turkjans.680019

Peng J, Sun D, Nevo E (2011). Wild emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides, occupies a pivotal position in wheat domestication process. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5:1127.

Peng J, Sun D, Peng Y, Nevo E (2013). Gene discovery in Triticum dicoccoides, the direct progenitor of cultivated wheats. Cereal Research Communications 41:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.2012.0030

Pinthus MJ (1969). Tillering and coronal root formation in some common and durum wheat varieties 1. Crop Science 9:267-272. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900030004x

Quarrie SA, Stojanović J, Pekić S (1999). Improving drought resistance in small-grained cereals: A case study, progress and prospects. Plant Growth Regulation 29:1-21.

Schoppach R, Taylor JD, Majerus E, Claverie E, Baumann U, Suchecki R, Sadok W (2016). High resolution mapping of traits related to whole-plant transpiration under increasing evaporative demand in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 67:2847-2860. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw125

Shahinnia F, Le Roy J, Laborde B, Sznajder B, Kalambettu P, Mahjourimajd S, Fleury D (2016) Genetic association of stomatal traits and yield in wheat grown in low rainfall environments. BMC Plant Biology 16:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0838-9

Suneja Y, Gupta AK, Bains NS (2019). Stress adaptive plasticity: Aegilops tauschii and Triticum dicoccoides as potential donors of drought associated morpho-physiological traits in wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00211

Tigkas D. Tsakiris G (2015). Early estimation of drought impacts on rainfed wheat yield in mediterranean climate. Environmental Processes 2:97-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-014-0052-4

Ullah S, Bramley H, Daetwyler H, He S, Mahmood T, Thistlethwaite R, Trethowan R (2018). Genetic contribution of emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccon Schrank) to heat tolerance of bread wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science. 9:1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01529

Wang HJ, Huang XQ, Röder MS, Börner A (2002). Genetic mapping of loci determining long glumes in the genus Triticum. Euphytica 123:287-293. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014909331902

Wu W, Zhou L, Chen J, Qiu Z, He Y (2018). GainTKW: a measurement system of thousand kernel weight based on the android platform. Agronomy 8:1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090178

Yin Q, Tian T, Kou M, Liu P, Wang L, Hao Z, Yue M (2020). The relationships between photosynthesis and stomatal traits on the loess plateau. Global Ecology and Conservation 23:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01146

Zargar SM, Zargar MY (2018). Abiotic stress-mediated sensing and signaling in plants: An omics perspective. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7479-0

Zhang H, Wang X, You M, Liu C (1999). Water-yield relations and water-use efficiency of winter wheat in the north china plain. Irrigation Science 19:37-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002710050069

Zwieniecki MA, Haaning KS, Boyce CK, Jensen KH (2016). Stomatal design principles in synthetic and real leaves. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 13:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0535

Published
2021-02-18
How to Cite
AKMAN, H. (2021). Assessment of morphological and anatomical variability in Triticum species, Aegilops species, interspecific and intergeneric hybrids. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 13(1), 10891. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb13110891
Section
Research articles
CITATION
DOI: 10.15835/nsb13110891