Influence of stubble biodestructor on soil microbiological activity and grain yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Antonina PANFILOVA

doi:10.15835/nsb13411035

Authors

Antonina PANFILOVA Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Faculty of Agricultural Technologies, George Gongadze St., 9, Mykolayiv, 54020 (UA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb13411035

Keywords:

after-harvest residues of pea and spring barley, cellulose-destructive microorganisms, stubble biodestructor, the destruction rate, the grain yield of winter wheat

Abstract

The aim of the work was to improve soil fertility and increase the yield of winter wheat using the stubble biodestructor by activating the microbiological activity of the soil. The experimental studies were on the research field of Mykolayiv National Agrarian University (Ukraine). After harvesting the precursor cultures of spring barley and peas the post-harvest residues of these crops were treated with a stubble biodestructor. After treatment of crop residues of spring barley and pea by the stubble biodestructor in the soil layer of 0 up to 20 cm the quantity of cellulose-destructive microorganisms increased by 27.9·10⁵up to 36.0·10⁵cfu/g of soil depending on the predecessor culture and the degree of degradation of these residues increased by 31.4 up to 45.1%. The number of nitrogen fixators in the 0-10 cm soil layer grew under the action of treatment of crop residues of spring barley and peas by stubble biodestructor on 13.4 up to 14.1 ·10⁶cfu/g of soilor 30.3 up to 35.0%. At the same time, a somewhat large number of bacteria in the soil was determined by the processing of post-harvest residues of peas, which was due to the biological characteristics of this legume culture. The average for years of researches at cultivating of winter wheat after spring barley using the stubble biodestructor the grain yield increased by 0.45 t ha^–1, or 20.9%, and after pea it increased by 0.67 t ha^–1 or 18.8% compared to the treatment variant of stubble just with water.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Balayev AD, Pikovskaya OB (2016). Використання соломи у відновленні родючості ґрунтів [Use of straw in the restoration of soil fertility]. Kyiv, CP Commercial.

Gamajunova V. (2017). Sustainability of soil fertility in Southern Steppe of Ukraine, depending on fertilizers and irrigation. Soil science working for a living applications of soil science to present-day problems. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 159-166.

Gamajunova VV, Kovalenko OA, Panfilova AV, Bolokhovskyi VV (2011). Вплив біодеструктора стерні на мікробіологічні показники грунту після ячменю ярого залежно від систем обробітку грунту та удобрення [Influence of the stubble biodestructor on microbiological parameters of soil after spring barley depending on tillage and fertilizer systems]. Proceedings of VNAU 7(47):7-11.

Gamajunova V, Panfilova A, Kovalenko O, Khonenko L, Baklanova T, Sydiakina O (2021). Better management of soil fertility in the Southern Steppe Zone of Ukraine. Better Management. Springer Nature Switzerland, pp 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68394-8_16

Hossain MZ, Fragstein P, Niemsdorff P, Heß J (2017). Effect of different organic wastes on soil properties and plant growth and yield: A review. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 48(4):224-237. https://doi.org/10.1515/sab-2017-0030

Hydbom S, Ernfors M, Birgander J, Hollander J, Jensen ES, Olsson PA (2017). Reduced tillage stimulated symbiotic fungi and microbial saprotrophs, but did not lead to a shift in the saprotrophic microorganism community structure. Applied Soil Ecology 119:104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.05.032

Kõlli R (2018). Influence of land use change on fabric of humus cover (pro Humus form). Applied Soil Ecology 123:737-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.06.022

Korsun S, Davydiuk G, Shkarivska L, Bolokhovskyi V, Bolokhovska V (2018). Changing the potential fertility of podzolized soils with the use of biological products. Agroecological Journal 1:50-56.

Lupwayi NZ, Lafond GP, Ziadi N, Grant CA (2012). Soil microbial response to nitrogen fertilizer and tillage in barley and corn. Soil and Tillage Research 118:139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.11.006

Markovskaya OE (2018). Динаміка чисельності мікроорганізмів у темно-каштановому грунті за різних систем основного обробітку та удобрення в сівозміні на зрошенні [Dynamics of microorganism in dark kastanozems in different systems of basic tillage and fertilizer in crop rotation on irrigation]. Agrology 1(3):294-299. https://doi.org/10.32819/2617-6106.2018.13009

McDonald JE, Rooks DJ, McCarthy AJ (2012). Methods for the isolation of cellulose degrading microorganisms. Methods in Enzymology 510:349-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415931-0.00019-7

Molina-Montenegro MA, Oses R, Atala C, Torres-Díaz C, Bolados G, León-Lobos P (2016). Nurse effect and soil microorganisms are key to improve the establishment of native plants in a semiarid community. Journal of Arid Environments 126:54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.10.016

Nilova NP, Novokhatsky ML, Bolokhovskaya VA, Rostotsky OV (2017). Біодеструктор стерні – ефективний засіб регулювання розкладання пожнивних решток [Biodestructor stubble is an effective means of management post-harvest residues]. Agricultural Machinery and Equipment 2(39):60-62.

Panfilova A, Gamayunova V, Smirnova I (2020). Influence of fertilizing with modern complex organic-mineral fertilizers to grain yield and quality of winter wheat in the southern steppe of Ukraine. Agraarteadus 31(2):196-201. https://doi.org/10.15159/jas.20.28

Panfilova A, Mohylnytska A (2019). The impact of nutrition optimization on crop yield of winter wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L.) and modeling of regularities of its dependence on structure indicators. Agriculture & Forestry 65(3):157-171. https://doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.65.3.13

Panfilova A, Mohylnytska A, Gamayunova V, Fedorchuk M, Drobitko A, Tyshchenko S (2020). Modeling the impact of weather and climatic conditions and nutrition variants on the yield of spring barley varieties (Hordeum vulgare L.). Agronomy Research 18(S2):1388-1403. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.20.159

Salmonová H, Bunešová V (2017). Methods of studying diversity of bacterial communities: a review. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica 48(3):154-165. https://doi.org/10.1515/sab-2017-0022

Sendetsky VM (2018). Ріст і розвиток рослин кукурудзи залежно від застосування соломи і сидератів [Growth and development of corn plants depending on the use of straw and green manure crops]. Agrology 1(3):281-285. https://doi.org/10.32819/2617-6106.2018.13007

Sendetsky VM (2019). Урожайність та якісні показники зерна кукурудзи за сумісного застосування соломи та сидератів [Crop yields and quality indicators of corn under joint application of straw and green manure]. Taurian Scientific Bulletin 105:147-154.

Veremeenko SI, Semenko LO (2019). Сучасні проблеми деградації грунтів – трофічний аспект [Modern problems of soil degradation – trophic aspect]. Scientific Horizons 1(74):69-75. https://doi.org/10.332491/2663-2144-2019-74-1-69-75

Volkogon VV (2011). Біологічна меліорація ґрунтів. Традиційне і нове [Biological melioration of soils. Traditional and new]. Agricultural Microbiology 13:7-22.

Vovkodav VV (2001). Metodyka derzhavnoho sortovyprobuvannia silskohospodarskykh kultur (zernovi, krupiani ta zernobobovi) [The method of state variety testing of agricultural crops (grain, cereals, and leguminous plants)]. In: State Communication of Ukraine for Testing and Protection of Plant Varieties. 2nd issue, Kyiv, pp 65.

Wang Y, Li C, Tu C, Hoyt GD, DeForest JL, Hu S (2017). Long-term no-tillage and organic input management enhanced the diversity and stability of soil microbial community. Science of the Total Environment 609:341-347.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.053