Persistence, dissipation behavior and health risk assessment of spiromesifen in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) by LC-MS/MS

  • Susheel SINGH Navsari Agricultural University, Food Quality Testing Laboratory, Navsari 396450, Gujarat (IN)
  • Vanrajsinh SOLANKI Navsari Agricultural University, Food Quality Testing Laboratory, Navsari 396450, Gujarat (IN)
  • Rohan KANSARA Navsari Agricultural University, Food Quality Testing Laboratory, Navsari 396450, Gujarat (IN)
  • Nitisha PATEL Navsari Agricultural University, Food Quality Testing Laboratory, Navsari 396450, Gujarat (IN)
  • Kelvin GANDHI Navsari Agricultural University, Food Quality Testing Laboratory, Navsari 396450, Gujarat (IN)
  • Hemant PATEL Navsari Agricultural University, Polytechnic Diploma College, Navsari 396450, Gujarat (IN)
Keywords: brinjal, dissipation, health risk assessment, liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, persistence, spiromesifen

Abstract

Brinjal (Solanum melongena) is a versatile crop infected by several insects and pests. For the control of these pests, spiromesifen insecticide has been in use to reduce the damage and increase crop production worldwide. Therefore, a field trial was conducted to study dissipation and persistence behavior of spiromesifen 22.9% w/w SC in/on brinjal at the recommended dose (RD) 96 g a.i./ha and double to recommended dose 192 g a.i./ha (2RD). The quantitative analysis of spiromesifen was performed using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Samples were processed by the Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe (QuEChERS) method. The analytical method was validated using various parameters viz., linearity (R2≥0.99), sensitivity (LOD and LOQ), accuracy (recovery=70-120%) and precision (RSD≤20%). The spiroemsifen persisted up to 3 days at RD and 5 days at 2RD. The dissipation half-life (DT50) of spriromesifen was 3.64 and 4.10 days at RD and 2RD in brinjal, respectively. However, residues of spiromesifen measured from soil at 0th (2 hr) day and 10th day were below the limit of quantification (BQL). The waiting period deciphered for spiromesifen applied in brinjal was 1 day at the recommended dose. Further, health risk assessment (health risk index<1 and percent health index<100) was performed on the basis of field trial which suggested that the application of spiromesifen in brinjal crop at recommended dose is safe for the end-users.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anonymous (2005). Acceptable daily intakes for agricultural and veterinary chemicals. Australian Government, Office of chemical safety. Department of Health and Ageing pp 1-113.

Anonymous (2011). Dietary guidelines for Indian - a manual. National Institute of Nutrition, ICMR publication. pp 1-139.

Anonymous (2021). Retrieved 2021 June 14 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/264065/global production-of-vegetables-by-type/

Anonymous (2019). Retrieved 2021 June 14 from https://www.agrifarming.in/brinjal-farming-profit-cost-yield income-eggplant.

AOAC Method (2007). Official Methods of Analysis 2007.01, Pesticide Residues in Foods by Acetonitrile Extraction and Partitioning with Magnesium Sulfate. Retrieved 2021 march 14 from: http://www.weber.hu/PDFs/QuEChERS/AOAC_2007_01.pdf.

Ara, S, Nahar N, and Rahman M (2007). Incidence and damage estimation of brinjal shoot and fruit borer in five different brinjal varieties. Progressive Agriculture 18(2): 75-80. http://doi.org/10.3329/PA.V18I2.18162

Asensio-Ramos M, Hernandez-Borges J, Ravelo-Perez LM and Rodriguez-Delgado MA (2010). Evaluation of a modified QuEChERS method for the extraction of pesticides from agricultural, ornamental and forestal soils. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 396:2307-2319. https://doi:.org/10.1007/s00216-009-3440-2

Banerjee T, Agyani MK (2019). Risk assessment and persistence evaluation of Spiromesifen 240 SC on cucumber in India. International Journal of Postharvest Technology and Innovation 6(1):11-25. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPTI.2019.104175

Borkakati RN, Venkatesh MR, Saikia DK (2019). Insect pests of Brinjal and their natural enemies. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 7(1): 932-937.

Central Insecticide Board and Registration committee (2020) Approved Uses of Registered Insecticides Major uses of pesticides registered under the Insecticides Act, 1968. Retrieved 2020 March 16 from http://ppqs.gov.in/sites/default/files/major_use_of_pesticides_insecticides.pdf

Cork A, Alam SN, Talekar K, Talekar NS (2005). Development and commercialization of mass trapping for control of eggplant borer, Leucinodes orbonalis in South Asia. Indian Institute of Vegetable Research. http://doi.org/10.1079/ber2005389

EPA Environmental Protection Agency (2013). Retrieved 2021 June 30 from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/01/16/2013-00728/spiromesifen-pesticide-tolerances

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2019). Retrieved 2021 June 19 from https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5579

The Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database (FAOSTAT) (2019). Retrieved 2021 June 19 from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QI

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2016). Retrieved 2021 June 19 from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/JMPR/Evaluation2016/SPIOMESIFEN.pdf

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2016). Spiromesifen ADI. Retrieved 2020 October 6 from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/JMPR/Evaluation2016/SPIROMESIFEN.pdf

Gautam M, Kafle S, Regmi B, Thapa G, Paudel S (2019). Management of brinjal fruit and shoot borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee) in Nepal. Acta Scientific Agriculture 3(9):188-195. http://doi.org/10.31080/ASAG.2019.03.0632

Hoskins WM (1961). Mathematical treatment of loss of pesticide residues. Plant Protection Bulletin 9:163-168. http://doi.org/10.12691/env-2-3-2

Kissoum N, Soltani N (2016). Spiromesifen, an insecticide inhibitor of lipid synthesis, affects the amounts of carbohydrates, glycogen and the activity of lactate dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 4(1):452-456.

Hlihor RM, Pogacean MO, Rosca M, Cozma P, Gavrilescu M (2019). Modelling the behavior of pesticide residues in tomatoes and their associated long-term exposure risks. Journal of environmental management 233:523-259. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.045

Malhat F, Abdallah H, Hegazy I (2012). Dissipation of chlorantraniliprole in tomato fruits and soil. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 88:349-351. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-150465-y

Mate CJ, Mukherjee I, Das SK (2015). Persistence of spiromesifen in soil: influence of moisture, light, pH and organic amendment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 187(2):1-12. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4207-6

Naeem MY, Ugur S (20190. Nutritional content and health benefits of eggplant. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology 29(7):31-36. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7isp3.31-36.3146

Patil VM, Singh S, Patel KG, Patel ZP (2018). Effect of sun drying and grinding on the residues of six insecticides in chilli fruits. Pesticide Research Journal 30(2):140-6. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-524X.2018.00023.7

Raj MF, Solanki PP, Singh S, Vaghela KM, Shah PG, Patel AR, Diwan KD (2012). Dissipation of spiromesifen in/on okra under middle Gujarat conditions. Pesticide Research Journal 24(1):25-27.

Ramasubramanian T, Paramasivam M, Salin KP, Jayanthi R (2012b). Dissipation kinetics of chlorantraniliprole in soils of sugarcane ecosystem. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 89(6):1268-1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0855-9

SANTE (2017) Guidance document on analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed. Retrieved 2020 October 5 from https://www.eurl-pesticides.eu/docs/public/tmplt_article.asp?CntID=727

Sharma KK, Mukherjee I, Singh B, Mandal K, Sahoo SK, Banerjee H, … Patel AR (2014). Persistence and risk assessment of spiromesifen on tomato in India: a multilocational study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 186(12):8453-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4016-y

Sharma KK, Rao CS, Dubey JK, Patyal SK, Parihar NS, Battu RS, Sharma V, Gupta P, Kumar A, Jaya M, Singh B (2007). Persistence and dissipation kinetics of spiromesifen in chili and cotton. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 132(1):25-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9499-8

Sharma KK (2013). Pesticide residues analysis manual, IARI, New Delhi, pp 92-94.

Solanki VH, Singh S, Gandhi KD, Patel KG and Patel KN (2019). Persistence behaviour of pre-mix formulation of profenophos and cypermethrin in/on sapota fruit. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8(1):1250-1260. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.801.132

Vinothkumar B, Shibani PV, Kaviya R, Kowshika J (2018). Dissipation pattern of spiromesifen in/on brinjal fruits. International Journal of Chemical Studies 6:2485-2488.

Published
2021-08-18
How to Cite
SINGH, S., SOLANKI, V., KANSARA, R., PATEL, N., GANDHI, K., & PATEL, H. (2021). Persistence, dissipation behavior and health risk assessment of spiromesifen in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) by LC-MS/MS. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 13(3), 11028. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb13311028
Section
Research articles
CITATION
DOI: 10.15835/nsb13311028