Growth-yield performances and partial economic analysis of sugarcane under different planting methods


  • Budi HARTOYO Central Java Assessment Institute for Agriculture Technology, Jl. Soekarno Hatta KM.26 No.10, Kotak Pos 124, Bergas, Semarang, 50552, Central Java (ID)
  • HARWANTO . Indonesian Citrus and Subtropical Fruits Research Institute, Jl. Raya Tlekung No.1, Kec. Junrejo, Kota Baru 65327, East Java (ID)
  • Forita D. ARIANTI Central Java Assessment Institute for Agriculture Technology, Jl. Soekarno Hatta KM.26 No.10, Kotak Pos 124, Bergas, Semarang, 50552, Central Java (ID)
  • Sri MINARSIH Central Java Assessment Institute for Agriculture Technology, Jl. Soekarno Hatta KM.26 No.10, Kotak Pos 124, Bergas, Semarang, 50552, Central Java (ID)
  • Raden H. PRAPTANA Central Java Assessment Institute for Agriculture Technology, Jl. Soekarno Hatta KM.26 No.10, Kotak Pos 124, Bergas, Semarang, 50552, Central Java (ID)
  • Budi WINARTO Ungaran Instalation for Research and Assessment on Agriculture Technology, Jl. BPTP No. 40, Bukit Tegalepek, Sidomulyo, Ungaran Timur, Semarang 50514, Central Java (ID)



economic analysis, growth, planting method, sugarcane, yield


Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is an important tropical crop around the world, involving in Indonesia, however low productivity is still problem for it. The study was aimed to investigate effect of different planting methods on improving cane growth-yield performances and their partial economic analysis. The study was conducted at Gedangdowo, Jepon, Blora District, Central Java, Indonesia from 2015-2017 at initial planting (IP) to sugarcane ratoon SR-1 and SR-2. Material used was qualified seeds of PS.862 variety. Three planting methods were tested: 1) double trench system (DTS) with 50 cm distance between trench and 135 cm distance between double trenches; 2) single trench system (STS) with 120 cm distance of canter to center (CTC) and 3) STS with 110 cm distance of CTC. The experiment was arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 6 replications. Results of the study revealed that DTS 50/135 was the most appropriate planting method inducing higher cane productivity up to 129.12 t/ha in IP, then increased up to 134.1 t/ha in SR-1 and declined down to 114.1 t/ha in SR-2. Percentage of cane productivity in DTS 50/135 increased up to 40.8% in IP, 51.1% in SR-1 and 64.6% in SR-2. Higher R/C ratio up to 1.99 and 1.94 was performed by STS 120 followed by DTS 50/135. Increasing R/C ratio noted in STS 120 and DTS 50/135 was 18.3 and 21.3%, respectively on SR-1 compared to STS 110. The planting method can be applied to improve sugarcane productivity and its R/C ratio for other varieties.


Metrics Loading ...


Bikila M, Dechassa N, Alemayehu N (2014). Effects of pre-cutting nitrogen application rate and time on seed cane quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) crop at Finchaa sugar estate. Advances in Crop Sciences and Technology 2:152.

Blora Statistic (2015). Blora in figures 2016. BPS Catalog: 1102001.3316, BPS-Statistics Blora Regency, pp 426.

Blora Statistic (2016). Blora in figures 2016. BPS Catalog: 33160.1605, BPS-Statistics Blora Regency, pp 391.

Blora Statistic (2017). Blora in figures 2017. BPS Catalog: 1102001.3316, BPS-Statistics Blora Regency, pp 383.

Bokhtiar SM, Roksana S, Moslehuddin AZM (2015). Soil fertility and productivity of sugarcane ınfluenced by enriched pressmud compost with chemical fertilizers. SAARC Journal of Agriculture 13(2):183-197.

Casaroli D, Júnior JA, Evangelista AWP (2019). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of sugarcane productivity in function of air temperature and water stress. Comunicata Scientiae 10(1):203-212.

Cholid M (2013). Improvement of sugarcane productivity and yield via source-sink approach. Info Teknik Perkebunan 5(12):46.

De Silva AGSD, Sanotharan N, Senevirathna CJ, Perera SK (2019). Analysis of the factors affecting farmers’ perception toward the sugarcane cultivation of small-scale farmers in Monaragala District of Sri Lanka. International Journal of Advances and Research 4(1):35-38.

Diana NE, Supriyadi, Djumali (2016). Growth, productivity, and sugar content of plant cane on several fertilizer pockets. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 21(3):159-166.

Directorate General of Estate (2020a, b, c). Sugarcane area by province in Indonesia, 2016-2020. [Online]. Website:

Djumali, Khuluq AD, Mulyaningsih S (2016). Sugarcane growth and productivity on several planting arrangement packages in upland area. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia 44(2):211-219.

Gulati JML, Sunmarg C, Jitendra Behra K, Jena SN, Lenka S (2015). Effect of planting methods on growth pattern and productivity of sugarcane varieties. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 49(3):222-228.

Hajar I, Susanti A, Prasetjono H (2019). Sugarcane agribusiness economical analysis: Case study at Munung village, Jatikalen subdistrict, Nganjuk District-East Java. Agrosaintifika: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian 1(2):51-58.

Hendayana R, Sudana W, Alihamsyah T, Yusron M, Supriyatna A, Erythrina (2014). Book guide for mentoring and guarding in acceleration of sugarcane integrated crop management. Indonesian Agency for Agriculture Research and Development. Agriculture Ministry, pp 56.

Hutahaean L, Ernawanto QD (2015). The feasibility of sugar cane farming with double row cropping system in East Java and Central Java. Jurnal Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian 18(2):157-167.

Indonesian Trading Ministry (2020). Low sugarcane productivity stimulate high price of sugar nationally.

Kadarwati TF (2020). Effect of different levels of potassium on the growth and yield of sugarcane ratoon in inceptisols. 1st International Conference on Sustainable Plantation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 418:1-11.

Lemos dos Santos R, Freire FJ, Almeida de Oliveira FC, Neto DES, Amaral de Medeiros MRF (2018). Productivity and technological quality of sugarcane under fertilization of nitrogen and molybdenum. Journal Soil Sciences of Plant Nutrition 18(4):1002-1020.

Majid HR (2014). Effect of planting material and row spacing on sugarcane yield and quality. AL – Muthanna Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2(1):1-11.

Mattjik AA, Sumertajaya IS (2006). Experimental design with sas and minitab application. IPB Press. Bogor, pp 276.

Mishra K (2019). Evaluation of bud chip method for enhancing yield and economics of sugarcane. International Journal of Chemical Studies 7(3):1726-1729.

Muttaqin L, Taryono, Kastono D, Sulistyono W (2016). Effect of intra-row spacing on early growth of bud chip seedlings of five sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) clones in alfisol dry land. Vegetalika 5(2):49-61.

Nadeem M, Tanveer A, Sandhu A, Javed S, Safdar ME, Ibrahim M, ... Arshad U (2020). Agronomic and economic evaluation of autumn planted sugarcane under different planting patterns with lentil intercropping. Agronomy 10(644):1-24.

Ngatinem A, Yulianto, Rusdi N (2019). The Effect of planting distance to sugarcane (Sacharum officinarum L.) plants growing using single-bud seed. International Journal of Scientific and Techology Research 8(2):10-14.

Pokharel D, Uprety R, Mehata S, Shrestha HK, Panday D (2019). Dynamics and economic analysis of sugarcane production in eastern plains of nepal. Current Agricultural Research Journal 7(2):201-212.

Prem G, Ramesh K, Singh VD, Kumar A, Choudhary R, Ahmad A (2017). Effect of planting methods on cane yield, water productivity and economics of spring planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) in Ambala (Haryana). International Journal of Agricultural Engineering 10(1):186-190.

Singh P, Singh SN, Tiwari AK, Pathak SK, Singh AK, Srivastava S, Mohan N (2019). Integration of sugarcane production technologies for enhanced cane and sugar productivity targeting to increase farmers’ income: strategies and prospects. 3 Biotech 9(48):1-15.

Society Relation Department (2020). Maintain stock and price of main food, Indonesian Trading Ministry did market operation at Jakarta. Society Relation Department. Indonesian Trading Ministry, pp 2.

Srivastava AK, Rai MK (2012). Sugarcane production: Impact of climate change and its mitigation. Biodiversitas 13(4):214-227.

Sudarto YG, Buludan, Utami SK (2020). Study of some cane varieties on dry land agroecosystems in Dompu district NTB. Crop Agro 13(1):10-21.

Tando E (2017). Review: Improvement sugarcane productivity (Saccarum officinarum L.) on dry land using organic materials and synthetic soil moisture. Jurnal Biotropika 5(3):90-97.

Zaky Y, Pambudy R, Harianto (2019). Sugarcane agribusiness efficiency analysis on cooperator and non-cooperator farmer at Blora district-Central Java. Agribusiness Forum 9(1):85-106.

Zuraina WK, Pudjianto E, Undin A, Damarjati SN, Magdalena E (2018). Tree crop estate statistics of Indonesia 2017-2019: Sugarcane. Secretariate of Directorate General of Estate Crops. Directorate General of Estate Crops. Ministry of Agriculture, pp 52.




How to Cite

HARTOYO, B., ., H., ARIANTI, F. D., MINARSIH, S., PRAPTANA, R. H. ., & WINARTO, B. (2021). Growth-yield performances and partial economic analysis of sugarcane under different planting methods. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 13(2), 10856.



Research articles
DOI: 10.15835/nsb13210856