Effects of Organic Mulch Materials on Soil Surface Evaporation

Brown Mang ONWUKA, Kingsley Chinyere UZOMA

Abstract


The effects of organic mulching material on soil surface evaporation were studied in Abia State. The objective of the study was to compare impact of mulch materials on saturated hydraulic conductivity and surface evaporation. The organic mulch materials were composted and non-composted Calapogonuim, Chromolena and Panicum spp. The design was randomized complete block design (RCBD). Data generated were statistically analysed. Analysis of variance was used to compare the influence of mulch materials on the measured soil properties and significant means were separated using least significant differences at 5% level of probability. Line graph was used to represent the impact of mulch materials on the surface evaporation. Results showed that saturated hydraulic conductivity of the soils increased significantly (P ≤ 0.05) with the application of the mulch materials. Soil applied with non-composted Chromolena spp. mulch material had the highest saturated hydraulic conductivity (73.00 cm hr-1). Soil surface evaporation varied with both composted and non-composted mulch materials at 3rd and 9th day. The volume of soil moisture lost to the atmosphere was lower in non-composted Calapogonuim mulch material compared with the other mulch materials under study (3rd to 9th day, 3.9 to 11.0 cm3 respectively). Composted and non-composted Panicum mulch was observed to be a more efficient physical barrier to prevent the loss of moisture to the atmosphere as compared to other mulch materials studied. From the present study, it was evident that application of mulch reduced the actual evaporation rates in the initial days after irrigation (coinciding with early periods of plant growth). The water was thus conserved and could be used by the crop subsequently during the later period of its growth.


Keywords


irrigation; organic mulch; saturated hydraulic conductivity; soil moisture; soil surface evaporation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998). Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome, 300(9):D05109.

Bhart R, Khera KC (2006). Effect of tillage and made of straw mulch application on soil erosion in the submontaneous trout of Punjab, India. Soil and Tillage Research 88(1-2):107-115.

Chukwu GO (2012). Soil survey and classification of Ikwuano, Abia state, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science and Water Resources 2(5):150-156.

Dec D, Dornerl J, Becker-Fazekas O, Horn R (2008). Effect of bulk density on hydraulic properties of homogenized and structured soils. Revista de la Ciencia del Suelo y Nutrición Vegetal 8(1):1-13.

Demir Z, Yildiz O, Toprak B (2009). Water retention ratios of mulching material consisting primarily of pine bark over different soil types. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41(4):1851-1859.

Diaz F, Jimenez CC, Tejedor M (2005). Influence of the thickness and grain size of tephra mulch on soil water evaporation. Agricultural Water Management 74(1):47-55.

Gülser C, Candemir F (2014). Using soil moisture constants and physical properties to predict saturated hydraulic conductivity. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences 3(1):77-81.

Kakaire J, Makokha GL, Mwanjalolo M, Mensah AK, Menya E (2015). Effects of mulching on soil hydro-physical properties in Kibaale sub-catchment, South Central Uganda. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences 3(5):127-135.

Kettler TA, Doran JW, Gilbert TL (2001). Simplified method for soil particle-size determination to accompany soil-quality analyses. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65(3):849-852.

Kumara S, De P (2011). Effects of different mulches and irrigation methods on root 254 growth, nutrient uptake, water-use efficiency and yield of strawberry. Scientia Horticulturae 127(3):318-324.

Li XY, Gong JD, Gaq QZ, Li FR (2001). Incorporation of ridge and furrow method of rainfall harvesting with mulching for crop production under semiarid conditions. Agricultural Water Management 50(3):173-183.

Li XY (2003). Curarel-sand mulch for soil and conservation in the semi-arid loess region of northwest China. Catena 52(2):105-127.

McMillian M (2013). The effect of mulch type and thickness on soil surface evaporation rate. Horticulture and Crop Science Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.

Nwokocha C, Olojede A, Mbagwu J (2007). Mulching an arenic hapludult at Umudike: Effects on saturated hydraulic conductivity and rhyizome yield of turmeric. African Journal of Biotechnology 6(17).

Papadopoulos A, Mooney SJ, Bird NRA (2006). Quantification of the effects of contrasting crops in the development of soil structure: an organic conversion. Soil Use and Management 22(2):172-179.

Rar G, Singh R (2004). Soil nature retention-transition studies and enhancing water use efficiency of winter crops through soil surface modification. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 8:18-23.

Stolte J (1997). Manual for soil physical measurements, Version 3. Wageningen DLO Winand Starring Centre for Integrated Land. Soil and Water Research, Technical Document 37.

Tolk JA, Howell TA, Evett SR (1999). Effect of mulch, irrigation and soil type on water use and yield of maize. Soil Tillage Research 50(2):137-147.

Unger PW, Parker JJ (1976). Evaporation reduction from soil with wheat, sorghum, and cotton residues. Soil Science Society of America Journal 40(6):938-942.

Xie ZK, Wang YJ, Jiang WL (2005). Evaporation and evapotranspiration in a watermelon filled mulched with gravel of different size in northwest china. Agricultural Water Management 81(1-2):173-184.

Yuan C, Lei T, Mao L, Liu H, Wu Y (2009). Soil surface evaporation processes under mulches of different sized gravel. Catena 78(2):117-121.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15835/nsb10310273


**********************************************************************

Under the aegis of Horticulture and Forestry Society from Transylvania

**********************************************************************